VIKRAMAJIT SEN
Saketh India Limited – Appellant
Versus
W. Diamond India Limited – Respondent
Vikramajit Sen, J.
1. The Appellant, Saketh India Limited, assails the impugned Order of the learned Single Judge passed on 24.8.2009, whereby two Applications preferred by the Appellant/Defendant were dismissed and the Suit filed under Order XXXVIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC' for short) for the recovery of mesne profits for the sum of Rupees 31,30,153/- together with interest and costs was decreed. In the first Application, IA No. 1171/2006, the Appellant/Defendant prayed for condonation of delay in entering appearance (that is filing the Address Form). In the second Application, IA No. 1170/2006, the Appellant/Defendant sought the rejection of the Plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that it had been declared a Sick Industrial Unit in terms of Section 3 (1) (o) of Sick Industrial Companies (special Provisions) Act, 1985 (`SICA' for short). Before us, the only aspect that has been argued is that SICA places a complete prohibition on all judicial proceedings leaving no alternative to the Trial Judge other than ordering the rejection of the Plaint.
2. It appears from a perusal of the records that Summons in Form 4 under Order XXXVII of the CPC we
Cement Corpn. of India v. Manohar Basin 82 1999) DLT 343 : 1999 51 DRJ 535
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer v. Corromandal Pharma (1997) 10 SCC 649
Hardip Singh v. Income Tax Officer
Jai Engineering v. Industrial Facilitation Council (2006) 8 SCC 677 : AIR 2006 SC 3252
NGEF Limited v. Chandra Developers (P) Ltd. (2005) 8 SCC 219
Real Value Appliances Ltd. v. Canara Bank (1998) 5 SCC 554
Rishabh Agro Industries Ltd. v. P.N.B. Capital Services Ltd. (2000) 5 SCC 515
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.