SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 1237

INDERMEET KAUR
Surjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Paramjeet Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. P.K. Jha, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate for the Respondent.

Indermeet Kaur, J.

1. The present appeal has impugned the judgment and decree dated 23.3.2006 which had reversed the finding of the Trial Judge dated 4.3.2005. Vide judgment and decree dated 4.3.2005 the suit of the plaintiff Paramjeet Singh was dismissed. The impugned judgment had decreed the suit for possession and permanent injunction.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are as follows:

(i) Plaintiff was stated to the owner of property i.e. house No. 8 B, Gali No. 5, Kundan Nagar, Bank Enclave Sharkarpur, Delhi. He has purchased it on 01.1.1990 from defendant No. 3 namely Mahender Kumar. Pursuant to this purchase the plaintiff started living in the first floor of the said house and the defendants started living on the ground floor. The plaintiff had cordial relations with defendant No. 3. Plaintiff was assured that after the defendants had constructed their own house they would shift therein and hand over the possession of the ground floor.

(ii) Father of the plaintiff was living in house No. V-162, Gali No. 5, Dispensary Wali Gali, Arvind Mohalla, Ghonda, Delhi. In 1996 his father become unwell; there was no one to look after him. Plaintiff is his only son ; his mother had alre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top