SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1442

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Simmi Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
Navin Malhotra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kajal Chandra, Adv., S.C. Singhal, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

Cs(Os) 984/2014

1. The Plaintiff - Smt. Simmi Dhawan has filed the present suit being CS(OS) 984/2014 seeking specific performance of agreement to sell dated 23rd December, 2013. On 29th August, 2018, arguments were heard on behalf of the parties and judgment was reserved. However, it was thereafter brought to the notice of the Court that another connected suit between the same parties, being CS(OS) 75/2017 was also pending and evidence was underway in the said matter. In CS(OS) 75/2017, evidence has since been concluded. Accordingly, the present judgment would be disposing of both the suits. At the time when submissions were heard in CS(OS) 984 /2014, the Defendants were duly represented by Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. After hearing submissions, judgment was reserved. However, once evidence in CS(OS)75/2017 concluded, Mr. Singhal Ld. Counsel has sought discharge in the said suit and has, accordingly, been discharged.

2. The case of the Plaintiff- Mrs. Simmi Dhawan is that vide agreement to sell and purchase dated 23rd December, 2013, the Defendant - Sh. Naveen Malhotra @ Navin Malhotra had agreed to sell the front portion of the two and a half storied b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top