PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Simmi Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
Navin Malhotra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Cs(Os) 984/2014
1. The Plaintiff - Smt. Simmi Dhawan has filed the present suit being CS(OS) 984/2014 seeking specific performance of agreement to sell dated 23rd December, 2013. On 29th August, 2018, arguments were heard on behalf of the parties and judgment was reserved. However, it was thereafter brought to the notice of the Court that another connected suit between the same parties, being CS(OS) 75/2017 was also pending and evidence was underway in the said matter. In CS(OS) 75/2017, evidence has since been concluded. Accordingly, the present judgment would be disposing of both the suits. At the time when submissions were heard in CS(OS) 984 /2014, the Defendants were duly represented by Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. After hearing submissions, judgment was reserved. However, once evidence in CS(OS)75/2017 concluded, Mr. Singhal Ld. Counsel has sought discharge in the said suit and has, accordingly, been discharged.
2. The case of the Plaintiff- Mrs. Simmi Dhawan is that vide agreement to sell and purchase dated 23rd December, 2013, the Defendant - Sh. Naveen Malhotra @ Navin Malhotra had agreed to sell the front portion of the two and a half storied b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.