SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1530

MUKTA GUPTA
Suresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Lokesh Khanna, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Nandita Rao, ASC.

JUDGMENT :

1. By this petition, the petitioner, who is the complainant in case FIR No. 294/2013, under Sections 326-A/34 IPC registered at P.S. Punjabi Bagh challenges the order dated 8th February, 2019 whereby the learned Trial Court, on an application filed by the accused recalled the petitioner/complainant/victim for cross examination.

2. The case of the petitioner/complainant is that she is the victim of acid attack and despite having appeared on number of dates and having been examined and cross examined extensively, when the learned counsel for the accused was not present, her further cross examination was closed vide order dated 12th September, 2018, however, for no rhyme and reasons and simply to harass the victim, an application was filed by the accused under Section 311 CrPC to recall her for cross examination on the pretext that she had to be confronted with certain photographs, which has been allowed by the impugned order.

3. Case of the accused/respondent No. 4, represented through his counsel, who had filed the application for recall of the petitioner is that the impugned order is a detailed and well reasoned order; one opportunity has been granted to the respondent for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top