SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1644

SANJEEV NARULA
Dabur India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Emami Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff :Hemant Singh, Manish Kumar Mishra, Akansha Singh, Advocates.
For the Defendant :Abhimanyu Bhandari, Roohina Dua, Anirudh Bakhru, Cheitanya Madan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

I.A Nos. 10869/2018 (under Order 39 Rule 1,2 CPC), 16105/2018 (under Order 39 Rule 1,2 CPC), 3084/2019 ( under Order 39 Rule 1,2,2A CPC) & 16106/2018 (under Section 151 CPC)

1. The afore-noted applications seeking ad-interim injunctions are being disposed of by this common order. By way of these applications, the Plaintiff seeks an order for restraining the Defendant from broadcasting, publishing and printing the advertisements that are subject matter of the present suit.

Proceedings in the Suit

2. Along with the suit, the Plaintiff filed an interim application [I.A No. 10869/2018] and sought restraining orders in respect of (a) Print Advertisement and (b) Television Commercial (TVC) [Collectively referred as 1st Impugned Advertisements]. This Court vide it’s order dated 27th August 2018 directed the Defendant not to publish the advertisement and to remove the TVC from the website www.youtube.com. The Court also directed the Defendant not to publish the ‘new advertisement’ which was yet to be aired. Aggrieved by the said order, the Defendant filed an Appeal bearing FAO (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top