JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

Crl.Rev.P. 279/2017 & Crl.M.A.6291/2017 (stay), Crl.M.A.11416/2017 (for directions), Crl.M.A.11417/2017 (filed on behalf of the petitioner for not taking on record few of documents of Annexure R-3), Crl.M.A.20785/2017 (for directions)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 20.01.2017, whereby, the Family Court has fixed interim maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- per month each for respondent No.1 wife and respondent No.2, minor son of the parties.

2. The contention of the petitioner is two folds. Firstly, that the Trial Court did not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition as the respondents, at the time of the filing of the petition, were residing in Fatehabad and secondly, that the trial Court has erred in not correctly appreciating the income of the petitioner and has awarded interim maintenance far in excess of the income disclosed by the petitioner. Further it is contended that petitioner had to shut down his business for attending to litigation in Delhi and has taken up an employment @ Rs. 15,000/- per month.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has contended that the respondents at the time of the filing of the petition under Sectio