IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
Sikodh Mahto - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Appeal 660 of 2017, Criminal Appeal 698 of 2017
Decided on : 06-06-2019
CRIMINAL - NDPS ACT - SECTION 20(B)(II)(C) - SEARCH AND SEIZURE - SECTION 50 OF THE NDPS ACT - COMPLIANCE - HELD, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 50 OF THE NDPS ACT IS FATAL TO THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTION, WHICH STANDS VITIATED, IN ITS ENTIRETY, THEREBY.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for smuggling charas from Nepal. The prosecution case was that the appellants were intercepted by a raiding team and, on being questioned, they admitted to carrying charas. They were informed of their right to have their search conducted by a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate, but they declined the offer. The raiding team then searched the appellants and recovered charas from their bags.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the search and seizure of the charas from the appellants was in violation of Section 50 of the NDPS Act, which requires that a search of a person be conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate, if the person so requires. The court found that the raiding team did not comply with this requirement, and therefore, the search and seizure was illegal.
Issues: Whether the search and seizure of the charas from the appellants was in violation of Section 50 of the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the search and seizure of the charas from the appellants was in violation of Section 50 of the NDPS Act, which requires that a search of a person be conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate, if the person so requires. The court found that the raiding team did not comply with this requirement, and therefore, the search and seizure was illegal.
Final Decision: The court acquitted the appellants of the charges against them.
JUDGMENT :
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as "the learned ASJ") has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the NDPS Act"). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years" rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of Rs. 1 lakh in each case, with default sentence of 1 years RI.
2. These appeals are directed thereagainst.
The Facts
The Case of the Prosecution
3. At 6:15 p.m. on 5th March, 2013, a secret informer visited the office of the Narcotics Cell, Shakarpur, and informed that two persons, namely Sikodh Mahto and Prabhu Mahto (the appellants herein), who were involved in smuggling of charas (cannabis) from Nepal, would arrive at the bus stand, near the Delhi Police Apartments, Noida Road, with a huge quantity of charas, between 7:30 and 8:00 p.m. The information was passed by Insp. Sanjay Kumar Gade (PW-8) to ACP N&CP Zile Singh, who issued directions for conducting the raid and taking of action on the basis thereof. The information was recorded by SI Rajnikant Sharma (PW-9) at about 6:45 p.m., and produced, under Section 42 of the NDPS Act, before the Inspector, Narcotics Cell, for appropriate action. SI Rajnikant (PW-9), thereafter, organized a raid party comprising Head Constable (HC) Kanwal Singh (PW-3), HC Narender (PW-2), HC Mahesh Kumar and himself, which proceeded to the spot in question, in a vehicle driven by Const. Satpal (PW-5). Passers-by were invited to join the raid team, but they refused. The appellants were seen walking towards the spot at about 7:55 p.m., with Sikodh Mahto (hereinafter referred to as "Sikodh") carrying a red and blue coloured bag and Prabhu Mahto (hereinafter referred to as "Prabhu") carrying a cream coloured bag. The informer identified them, and left. At about 8 p.m., the appellants were intercepted and overpowered. SI Rajnikant (PW-9) introduced himself to them. On being queried, they disclosed their names to be Sikodh Mahto and Prabhu Mahto. The appellants were apprised of the fact that information, regarding their carrying charas, had been received, and that their persons and bags would have to be searched. They were asked whether they desired to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate, and were also provided copies of notices under Section 50 of the NDPS Act. The appellants refused the offer for having the search conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer/Magistrate. Sikodh conveyed his refusal in writing, whereas Prabhu, who was illiterate, instructed that his refusal be recorded, in writing, by SI Rajnikant (PW-9), on the original notice which was, thereafter, read over to Prabhu. Prabhu, thereafter, affixed his left hand thumb impression under the said note. SI Rajnikant (PW-9) requested five or six public persons, who had gathered at the spot, to join the investigation, but they refused.
4. SI Rajnikant (PW-9), thereafter, conducted the search of Sikodh. The red and blue coloured bag, being carried by him, was found to contain a black, slab-type substance, in a transparent polythene. On being tested, using the Field Drug Testing Kit carried by SI Rajnikant, the substance was found to be charas, 2 kg in weight. From the said substance, two samples, of 50 grams each, were recovered, and kept in two separate polythene bags, which were tied with rubber bands and converted into two cloth pullandas, marked "A" and "B". The remaining quantity of charas, weighing 1.9 kg, was kept in the same transparent polythene, in the red and blue coloured bag, of which a third pullanda was prepared, marked "C". The Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) form was filled. The seal "RKS" was affixed on all the three pullandas, as well as on the FSL form. After use thereof, the seal was handed over to HC Kanwal Singh (PW-3). All th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.