ANU MALHOTRA
Prateek Singhal – Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency (NTA) Department of High Education Ministry of Human Resources Develpment – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner who obtained 322 marks out of 500 in 10+2 Examination conducted for the year 2017-18 and who thus secured 64.4% marks in the Standard 12 examination conducted by the CBSE seeks to pursue the Five year B. Arch. Degree course at the Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal. The petitioner applied for the JEE (Main) vide application dated 27.9.2018 of which the result was declared of the First Attempt on 31.1.2019 and the petitioner also appeared for the second Attempt of the JEE (Main), the result of which was declared on 14.5.2019.
2. The petitioner submits that on 1.9.2018, the respondent No.1 i.e., the National Testing Agency published its Information Bulletin for the First Attempt of the JEE (Main) on 1.9.2018 and clause 3.1. thereof spelt out the eligibility for admission to NITs, IIITs and CFT through Central Seat Allocation Board. The said clause 3.1 of the Information Bulletin for the First Attempt of the JEE (Main), 2019 as uploaded by the National Testing Agency i.e., the respondent No.1 copies of which have been placed on record
A.P. Christians Medical Educational Society v. Govt. of A.P.
Guru Nanak Dev University v. Parminder Kr. Bansal
Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhary Devi Lal University
Regional Officer, CBSE v. Sheena Peethambaran
Tariq Islam v. Aligarh Muslim University
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.