SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1696

ANU MALHOTRA
Prateek Singhal – Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency (NTA) Department of High Education Ministry of Human Resources Develpment – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R.M. Sinha, P.M. Sinha, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Amit Bansal, Arjun Mitra, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner who obtained 322 marks out of 500 in 10+2 Examination conducted for the year 2017-18 and who thus secured 64.4% marks in the Standard 12 examination conducted by the CBSE seeks to pursue the Five year B. Arch. Degree course at the Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal. The petitioner applied for the JEE (Main) vide application dated 27.9.2018 of which the result was declared of the First Attempt on 31.1.2019 and the petitioner also appeared for the second Attempt of the JEE (Main), the result of which was declared on 14.5.2019.

2. The petitioner submits that on 1.9.2018, the respondent No.1 i.e., the National Testing Agency published its Information Bulletin for the First Attempt of the JEE (Main) on 1.9.2018 and clause 3.1. thereof spelt out the eligibility for admission to NITs, IIITs and CFT through Central Seat Allocation Board. The said clause 3.1 of the Information Bulletin for the First Attempt of the JEE (Main), 2019 as uploaded by the National Testing Agency i.e., the respondent No.1 copies of which have been placed on record

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top