SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 3277

R.K.GAUBA
A. M. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Praveen Nagar, Pranjay Chopra, Hema Narula, Nitin Chahar and Shubham, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Amit Ahlawat, APP and Arun, SI.

ORDER :

R.K. Gauba, J.

1. Though the petitioner has given his full description, having regard to the background facts, which would need to be elaborated to an extent little later, it being inappropriate to disclose his identity, he is being referred to in the cause title as "A.M.", and wherever necessary hereinafter as the "petitioner" or "the victim" (or as "PW-1"). For similar reasons, for sake of convenience, the second to fourth respondents would also be referred to as "A1" "A2" and "A3" respectively. The registry while uploading this order on the website shall also take similar care.

2. A1, A2 and A3 had been brought before the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) for inquiry on the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted on 22.05.2006, upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) no. 382/2005 (Ex. PW7/B) of police station Mukherjee Nagar. The FIR had been registered on 05.09.2005 on the statement (Ex. PW1/A) of the petitioner, he, at the relevant point of time being a child aged seven and half years. According to the allegations in the FIR, a case of complicity of A1, A2 and A3 who may collective

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top