SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 3288

S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA
Joginder @ Danny – Appellant
Versus
State (Nct) of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocate Mr. Aditya Madaan. Advocate
For the Respondent:ASC Sanjay Lao with Mr. Hirein Sharma, Advocate for State of NCT of Delhi

JUDGMENT :

I.S. Mehta, J.

1. The Appellants have preferred two separate appeal i.e. (Crl. A. 336/2017 & Crl. A. 515/2017) under Section 374 Read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., against a common judgment and order on sentence dated 22.02.2017 and 28.02.2017 respectively by which all the Appellants have been convicted under Section 364/120B IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.15,000/- each and in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment for one year. For the offence under Section 392/120B IPC they have been sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven year with fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment for three months; for the offence under Section 302/120B IPC sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of 25,000/- each and in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment for one year; for the offence under Section 201/120B IPC sentence to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment for one year, the Appellants have b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top