SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1711

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Rajender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rama Bala Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.K. Malik, Advocate with Ms. Meena Jindal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ms. Manisha Parmar, Advocate with Ms. Siddhi Mittal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 29.11.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for specific performance filed by the appellant/plaintiff with respect to the suit property bearing no. E-2, Upper Ground Floor, Jawahar Park, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092 and with respect to which, the parties had entered into two agreements on 20.02.2008, one being an Agreement to Sell and another being an Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter “MOU”).

2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff pleaded that he had entered into two agreements with the respondent/defendant, with the appellant/plaintiff being the buyer and the respondent/defendant being the seller, whereby the suit property was agreed to be sold to the appellant/plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 27 lakhs. The first agreement is the Agreement to Sell is dated 20.02.2008, and this document records the receipt of Rs. 4.50 lakhs as advance earnest m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top