IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
Mrs. Vasumati Mahajan And Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 1524 of 2018, CM No. 6253 of 2018
Decided On : 13-04-2018
The Court held that the respondent cannot run a pre-primary school without the road on which the property is situated is identified for mixed use, NOC from the occupants of the other dwelling units in the building, and sanction of the SDMC for running a pre-primary school from the ground floor of the property are taken/obtained.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, co-owners of the upper floors of a property, filed a writ petition seeking a prohibition against the respondent from granting permission to open a pre-primary school in the ground floor and basement of the property. The petitioners contended that the property was meant for residential use only and that setting up a school would violate statutory rules and regulations, including the Master Plan of Delhi 2021 (MPD 2021), the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (DMC Act), and the Building Byelaws.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the property was indeed meant for residential use only and that setting up a school would require a change of use from residential to non-residential, which would require permission from the SDMC under Section 347 of the DMC Act. The Court also found that the MPD 2021 allowed for mixed use in residential areas, including pre-primary schools, but that certain conditions had to be met, such as obtaining prior sanction from the SDMC and providing adequate parking space.
Issues: 1. Whether a pre-primary school can be opened from a property situated on a road that has not been notified for mixed-use activities. 2. Whether prior sanction of the SDMC is required to be obtained by the respondent for starting a pre-primary school.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the respondent could not run a pre-primary school without obtaining the necessary permissions and approvals from the SDMC. The Court relied on the provisions of the MPD 2021, the DMC Act, and the Building Byelaws to conclude that a change of use from residential to non-residential required prior sanction from the SDMC. The Court also found that the respondent had not obtained the necessary NOCs from the occupants of the other dwelling units in the building, which was a requirement under the MPD 2021.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and held that the respondent could not run a pre-primary school without obtaining the necessary permissions and approvals from the SDMC and the NOCs from the occupants of the other dwelling units in the building.
JUDGMENT :
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-
“In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass:
A. A Writ, Order and/or Direction in the nature of PROHIBITION, inter alia restraining the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 from granting any permission to Respondent No.4 and/or 5 to open any school, including any Pre-Primary School/Montessori Preschool/Daycare, from ground floor and/or basement of property bearing no. E-68, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi.
B. A Writ, Order and/or Direction, in the nature of MANDAMUS, inter alia directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to ensure that no school, including any Pre-Primary School/Montessori Preschool/Daycare, is opened from ground floor and/or basement of property bearing No. E-68, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi.
AND/OR
ANY OTHER FURTHER WRIT, ORDER AND/OR DIRECTION, WHICH THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM JUST FIT AND PROPER, IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioner No.1 is one of the co-owners of the entire upper floors including first, second and third floor as well as terrace of the property No. E-68, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi with her daughter by virtue of Conveyance Deed dated February 14, 2003. The said first, second and third floor of the property has been let out by the petitioner No.1 to various tenants, who are living there. Petitioner No.2 is the tenant on the third floor of the said property. The petitioners have stated that to the best of their knowledge, ground floor and basement portion of the said property are owned by respondent No.2. There are two driveways in the property; one on the right side of the property used by owners/occupiers of ground floor and basement while the one towards the left side of the property used by owner/occupiers of the above floors.
3. On or about December 16/17, 2017, the respondent No.2 had telephonically contacted Mr. Harish Mahajan, the son of the petitioner No.1 and informed him that respondent No.2 was interested in setting up a pre-primary school from the ground floor and the basement of the said property. According to the petitioners, during the conversation, Mr. Harish Mahajan has specifically informed respondent No.2, no portion of the property could be used for opening of any school of any nature whatsoever as the property is neither commercial in nature or it had been built for carrying out any commercial activity including opening of any school. According to the petitioners, Mr. Mahajan had emphasized that the same would be in violation of statutory Rules and Regulations and would cause a lot of harassment and nuisance to the other occupiers of the property. A reference in the writ petition is made to a whatsapp message sent by respondent No.2 on December 18, 2017 and by Mr. Harsh Mahajan on December 20, 2017 and December 21, 2017 to respondent No.2. It is stated, pursuant to the communications referred above, respondent No.2 contacted Harish Mahajan and informed him that the respondent No.2 has not taken any decision. Thereafter, on February 13, 2018, the petitioners were dismayed to see a banner put up outside the front gate of the said property to the effect that Montessori Pre School and a Daycare is opening from property very soon by respondent No.3. According to the petitioner, apprehending collusion between respondent Nos.2 and 3 that they would take steps to establish some school from the premises, they have filed the present petition on various grounds. Suffice to state, the grounds shall be dealt with while noting the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners. In substance, it can be stated here that it is the case of the petitioners that setting up of a school in the property would be in violation of MPD 2021, DMC Act, Building Byelaws and the Constitution.
4. A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.