PRATHIBA M SINGH
Swami Ramdev – Appellant
Versus
Facebook, Inc – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs filed suit against defendants for defamation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court provided temporary injunction for url blocking. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented regarding defamation and intermediary liability. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. defendants argue against global injunction, citing varying defamation laws. (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. court's analysis on the need for global blocking due to jurisdictional issues. (Para 22 , 26 , 30) |
| 6. intermediaries must comply with court orders for removal of defamatory content. (Para 34 , 46 , 56 , 60) |
| 7. court's interpretation of section 79 on blocking and removal of content. (Para 72 , 91 , 94) |
| 8. final orders for global removal/blocking of urls containing defamatory content. (Para 96 , 97) |
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
I.A. 855/2019
1. The Plaintiffs - Swami Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. have filed the present suit against the Defendants- Facebook Inc., (Defendant No. 1) Google Inc., (Defendant No. 2) YouTube LLC, (Defendant No. 3) Google Plus, (Defendant No. 4) Twitter International Company, (Defendant No. 5) and Ashok Kumar ('John Does'), (Defendant No. 6) seeking a permanent and mandatory injunction, as also damages. For the
ABC Laminart v AP Agencies, Salem
Modi Entertainment Network and Another v. W.S.G. Cricket PTE Ltd.
R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal v Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Others
Shreya Singhal v Union of India
Suresh Jindal v. Rizosli Corriere Della Sera Prodzioni T.V. S.p.a. and Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.