IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BRIJESH SETHI, J.
Ritika - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Application No. 887 of 2019
Decided On : 16-10-2019
Anticipatory Bail - Abetment of Suicide - Section 438, Section 482 of Cr.P.C. - [Section 438, Section 482] - The judgment discusses the alleged abetment of suicide by a teacher, the contents of the suicide note, statements of witnesses, and the role of the petitioner in the commission of suicide. The court analyzes the suicide note, witness statements, and FSL report to determine the seriousness of the allegations and the likelihood of the petitioner influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence. The court dismisses the anticipatory bail application based on the serious and direct allegations of abetment to suicide against the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The case involves the alleged suicide of a child who was studying in a school where she was reportedly mentally tortured by her teachers. The suicide note and witness statements indicate that the deceased child was subjected to harsh treatment and called 'characterless' by the petitioner, a teacher at the school.
Finding of the Court:
The court finds serious and direct allegations of abetment to suicide against the petitioner based on the suicide note, witness statements, and FSL report. The court dismisses the anticipatory bail application, considering the nature of the offense and the likelihood of the petitioner influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence.
Issues: The main issue revolves around the alleged abetment of suicide by the petitioner, as indicated by the suicide note and witness statements. The court also considers the likelihood of the petitioner influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision is based on the seriousness of the allegations, the contents of the suicide note, witness statements, and the likelihood of the petitioner influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence. The court emphasizes the need to protect children from mental harm and considers the petitioner's role in the alleged mental torture of the deceased child.
Final Decision: The court dismisses the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner, citing serious and direct allegations of abetment to suicide, the nature of the offense, and the likelihood of the petitioner influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence.
JUDGMENT :
Brijesh Sethi, J.
Vide this order, I shall dispose of an application filed by the petitioner Ritika under section 438 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 38/19 registered at PS Inderpuri.
2. The case of the prosecution is that X (actual name withheld) the only daughter of the complainant (who was born on 20.12.2005) was studying in class-VII at Gyan Mandir Public School, E-Block, Nariana Vihar, New Delhi-110028. The complainant is an Advocate by profession and is practicing at Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. The daughter of the complainant had been asking the complainant to change her school for the last three months but the complainant had told her that since most of the session is over, she will definitely change her school next year. The complainant had also been asking her daughter the reason for change of school but she had only replied that the atmosphere in the school is not good. On 30.11.2018, the daughter of the complainant had come weeping from the school and told the complainant in the evening that she would not go to school tomorrow. On next day i.e. on 01.12.2018, the daughter of the complainant did not go to school and stayed at home. As usual, the complainant went to court at about 1.00 p.m. asking her daughter to take help of her grandmother (Nani) who resides in the same lane at a little distance. In the evening, the complainant had contacted her tuition teacher to prepare her daughter for the tests which were to commence from Monday i.e. 03.12.2018. However, the tuition teacher replied that she has not turned up. Complainant also contacted her mother who resides in the same locality to contact her daughter and try to send her for tuition. In the meanwhile, the complainant also reached home at about 6.00 p.m and knocked the door repeatedly but the same was not opened. The complainant thought that her daughter might be in sound sleep but after passage of nearly an hour, she became panicky and asked the neighbours to break open the glass of the window which was by the side of main door. After breaking the glass, she managed to open the door and when she entered the room, she saw that her daughter was hanging with the ceiling fan. She hurriedly brought her down after opening the knot of the Chunni with the help of the neighbourers. The complainant with the help of her neighbours took her to Kapoor Nursing Home, Nariana Vihar. On the door of the hospital, one junior doctor met the complainant and told her that there is no facility of ventilator and therefore, she should take her daughter to some other hospital. Complainant asked her for ambulance but the doctor blatantly refused. She managed a three wheeler scooter and took her daughter to Kheda Metro Hospital in Pandav Nagar, Delhi where she was declared brought-dead.
3. The Investigating Officer conducted the investigation and recorded her statement. Complainant told all the facts to the IO but at that time she was not aware that her deceased daughter has written a suicide note. The complainant, therefore, told the IO that at present she is unable to say as to who is responsible for suicide.
4. It is the case of the prosecution that though when the complainant was lifting her daughter after bringing her down from ceiling fan, she had noticed that something was written in the register but since the daughter was to be rushed to the hospital, she did not care to go through the same. At the time when dead body was being moved, doctor at the hospital had noticed something written by pen on both the hands and palms. The doctor had asked her to take photographs from her mobile phone but she was in great shock, she had asked the doctor to help her. The doctor with the mobile phone of the complainant took photographs of both palms and hands where something was written. The photographs taken by the doctor revealed that on one palm, it has written that, "meri maut ki khabar school tak jarur pahuchana".
5. Some persons and childre
Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.