ANU MALHOTRA
Rinku @ Ram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anu Malhotra, J.
The appellant namely Rinku @ Ram Prasad, vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 22.03.2019 and the impugned order on sentence dated 23.03.2019 of the learned ASJ-01, North West, Rohini, Delhi (Special Court POCSO) in Sessions Case no.44/2017 vide which the appellant herein was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act, 2012) and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of seven years along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of the payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three years for the offence punishable under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years along with a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of the payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, with it having been directed that both the sentences would run concurrently.
2. The Trial Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.