JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

On 11.09.2019, after hearing learned counsel for the parties at some length, I had made the following observations :

2. Apart from anything else, what is curious and completely unexplained at least at this stage, is the contradiction between the contents of the opening sheet of the written test taken by the petitioner in respect of Paper No.IV (Surgery II) and what is apparent from a visual examination of the answer sheet enclosed therewith.

2.1 The opening sheet adverts to marks which add up to 9 (nine) whereas a perusal of the answer sheet would show that no marks have been allotted by the examiner against answers set forth therein.

3. The impugned order of the University of Delhi, which is, dated 14.08.2019, inter alia, states as follows :

Part-IV Surgery-II Part-D Questions had been checked properly and marks have been added on the inside now NO CHANGES TO THE MARKS.

3.1 Thus, as is apparent, even according to the University of Delhi, no marks had been allocated by the examiner when the answer sheet of the petitioner was evaluated in the first instance.

4 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate, who appears on behalf of the University of Delhi, says that he will