SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Narayan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Kishore Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
1. Petitioner impugns order dated 06.07.2018 whereby the Executing Court has sentenced the petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 30 days because the execution has remained unsatisfied for more than 4 years.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Executing Court has erred in not appreciating the judgment of the Supreme Court in Jolly George Verghese Vs. The Bank of Cochin, (1980) 2 SCC 360.
3. Learned counsel further submits that an Order 21 Rule 37 CPC has no application in the facts and of the present case as there is prayer of the decree holder for execution of the decree for the arrest and detention in the present case.
4. Learned counsel further submits that the impugned order was passed on an application under Section 55 CPC. He further contends that prior to exercise of any power under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC, it is mandatory to issue a show cause notice calling upon the judgment debtor to show cause as to why he should be committed to civil prison.
5. Learned counsel submits that no such show cause notice was issued prior to the passing of the impugned order. He further submits that no finding as required by the prov
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.