BRIJESH SETHI
Kishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Brijesh Sethi, J.
1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of an anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner kishan Lal under section 438 Cr.P.C. r/w. section 482 CrPC in FIR No. 0357/19 u/s. 406/420/120-B IPC.
2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present FIR. The petitioner is aged about 50 years and is doing the business of sale/purchase of various fruits at New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi for the last more than 30 years and main accused Leela Kishan is also engaged in same business and he was one of the partner of the petitioner since last 18 years and running their partnership business from Shop no. B-972, New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi (in short ‘shop in question’) being the joint owners of the shop in equal share of 50% each. Due to financial hardship co-accused Leela Kishan entered into an agreement to sell/purchase with Virender Tuteja in the month of March, 2019 in respect of 50% share of his shop no. B-972, New Subzi Mandi, Delhi and received a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- in cash from Virender Tuteja. Since the petitioner was also having share t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.