SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Del) 34

VIBHU BAKHRU
Naresh @ Pappu Pager – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Salman Hashmi, Advocate, Mohd Adil, Advocate, Kusum Dhalla, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VIBHU BAKHRU, J.

1. The present appeal arises out of a judgment dated 03.06.2017 passed by the Learned ASJ, (North), Rohini Courts, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 392/394/34 and Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). By an order dated 07.06.2017, the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- for the offence punishable under Sections 393/34 of the IPC; five years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2000/- for the offence punishable under Sections 394/34 of the IPC and in default, simple imprisonment for a further period of three months; and seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine for Rs. 3000/- for the offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC and in default, simple imprisonment for a further period of four months. All the sentences are directed to run concurrently.

2. The brief facts of the prosecution's case are that in the intervening night of 15.12.2012 and 16.12.2012, on receipt of DD no. 2B, PSI Pawan Kumar reached the spot, that is, near Kotak Mahindra Bank, ATM, Hudson Lane, Kingsway Camp where he met Beat Ct. Om Prakash and came to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top