HIMA KOHLI, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Jyotsna Shingwani – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The matter has been heard through Video Conferencing.
2. The petitioner, who is currently in the 23rd week of pregnancy, has approached this Court, for an appropriate writ, directing the respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy. Besides the above relief, the petitioner has also challenged the vires of Sections 3(2)(b) and 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (in short, ‘MTP Act’). However, we do not propose to go into the aspect of the legality of the aforesaid provisions as on the date of admission of the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he did not wish to press the challenge the vires of the said provisions.
3. Facts in brief leading to filing of this writ petition are as under:
(b) On 25.01.2020 and again on 07.02.2020, the petitioner was advised to undergo a Level-II scan, as part of the general process, to check upon the foetus.
(c) As advised, she underwent a Level-II scan in her 21st week of pregnancy, ie., on 03.04.2010.
(d) The report, dated 0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.