All India Petroleum Dealers Association (Regd. ) vs Union of India Through Its Secretary

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Del) 343

RAJIV SHAKDHER
All India Petroleum Dealers Association (Regd. ) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through Its Secretary – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pushkar Sood with Mr. Virendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Ms. Mala Narayan, Ms. Neha Dawar, Mr. Rahul Narayan, Mr. Shashwat Goel, Ms. Neha Dawar, Mr. Kanu Aggarwal, and Mr. Manan Popli, Advocates for IOCL. Mr. Anil Kumar Batra, Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Shashi Bala, Mr. Parijat Sinha, and Mr. Rudra Dutta Advocates for BPCL., Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Ms. Santwana, Advocates for HPCL.
Mr. Soumya Chakraborty, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pabitra Pal Chowdhury, Advocates for the applicant in CM No.47111/2017.
Mr. Siva Bala Murugan, Mr. Vivek Bharathi, and Mr. T. Dinesh, Advocates for the applicant in CM 3870/2018.
Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Kohli, and Mr. Shanth Kumar Mahale, Advocates for the applicant in CM 1695/2018.

Table of Content
1. petitioners challenge motor discipline guidelines amendments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. context for the amendments in guidelines. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments by parties regarding amendments. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court examines historical context and previous rulings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. debate on clarity of amendments and rationale. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. assessment on mandatory wage payment and implications. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
7. court's view on recalibration of dispensing units. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
8. safety protocols concerning toilet access. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
9. court reviews penalties and enforcement mechanisms. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
10. understanding boundaries of omcs' authority and implications. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)
11. concluding directions on guidelines and penalties. (Para 56)
12. final disposition of the writ petitions. (Para 57)

JUDGMENT :

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

Preface ............................................................................

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(Del) 343

RAJIV SHAKDHERAll India Petroleum Dealers Association (Regd. ) – AppellantVersusUnion of India Through Its Secretary – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

RAJIV SHAKDHER
All India Petroleum Dealers Association (Regd. ) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through Its Secretary – Respondent