SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Nitin Jain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CRL. M.A. 4549/2020
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 1164/2020
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek directions thereby for quashing of FIR No. 188/2011 dated 23.07.2011, registered at PS Preet Vihar and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and counsel for respondent no.2 who is present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement cum compromise deed on 01.10.2019.
8. Learned APP has opposed the present petition and submits that due to the registration of FIR, government machinery came in motion and a lot of precious public time has been consumed, therefore, if this Court is inclined to quash FIR, heavy cost may be imposed upon petitioners.
9. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court and has been identified by Inspector Mahender Kumar. She
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.