VIPIN SANGHI, SANJEEV NARULA
Udbhav Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
1. We have heard learned counsels for the parties at length and proceed to dispose of the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek a direction to the respondents to appoint him as a Judicial Officer to the Delhi Judicial Service against the vacancy for which he was declared “selected” vide public notice dated 21.05.2019, with all consequential benefits. He also seeks a direction to the respondents to produce the medical examination record of the petitioner, conducted by Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital, Delhi (AAAG Hospital) and Lok Nayak Hospital (LN Hospital).
3. The background facts are that respondent No. 1, i.e. High Court of Delhi invited applications vide notice dated 13.11.2018 for filling up of 50 vacancies in the Delhi Judicial Services (DJS). There was a corrigendum issued on 19.11.2018 in relation to the number of vacancies. The same was revised upwardly to 147. In relation to the General Category, 112 seats were notified and the others were for reserved categories such as SC and ST. The petitioner filled his on-line application as a General Category candidate. The preliminary examination for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.