SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJIV SHAKDHER
SHAMA KAUR – Appellant
Versus
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : O.P. Goyal
For the Respondent: Ataul Haque

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

1. This is an appeal u/s 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the Act') against the judgment dated 18.4.1996, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in Suit No. 584 of 1988.

2. By virtue of the said judgment, the appellants have been awarded a compensation of Rs. 91,200. The appellants being aggrieved by the same, have preferred the present appeal.

3. Before adverting to the submissions made on behalf of the parties, it may be useful to detail out certain facts and circumstances, which are necessary for the disposal of the present appeal.

4. On 5.6.1988, one Pritam Singh had met with a road accident while he was proceeding from Janakpuri to Kamla Market. The cause spelled out being rash and negligent driving of a bus bearing registration No. DHP 3356 (hereinafter in short referred as 'the offending vehicle') owned by respondent No. 1, i.e., Delhi Transport Corporation. The offending vehicle was driven by its driver, respondent No. 2, i.e., Bakshi Ram. The victim Pritam Singh succumbed to the injuries sustained in the accident. Pritam Singh died on 5.6.1988.

5. Aggrie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top