SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJIV KHANNA
R. K. MALIK – Appellant
Versus
KIRAN PAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anuj Jain
For the Respondent: L.K. Tyagi and Kishore Rawat

JUDGMENT :

Sanjiv Khanna, J.—By this common order, I shall be disposing of 22 appeals, the details and particulars of which have been given below:

S.No.

Appeal Number

Name of the Deceased

Age

Claimant relationship with the Deceased

Date of filing the Claim

Date of the Decision

Amount awarded as Pecuniary Damages (Loss of Dependency
 + Funeral Last Rites) in Rs. Rate of interest

1.

MACA 205-206/05

Manju Yadav

16

Parents

11-3-98

22-11-04

1,65,000
 (1,60,000+5,000)
 6% for four years

2.

MACA 196/05

Pallavi Thakur

13

Parents

17-3-98

22-11-04

1,55,000
 Thakur (1,50,000+5,000)
 -do-

3

MACA 742-743/05

Rahul Sharma

8

Parents

17-4-98

22-11-04

1,30,000
 (1,25,000+5,000)
 -do-
 

4

MACA 195/05

Kumari Anu

7

Parents

29-5-98

22-11-04

1,30,000
 (1,25,000+5,000)
 -do-

5

MACA 228-229/05

Neeraj Kumar

12

Parents

23-3-98

22-11-04

1,55,000
 (1,50,000+5,000)
 -do-

6

MACA 213/05

Parul

6 ½

Parents

11-3-98

22-11-04

1,30,000
 (1,25,







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top