SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.R.MIDHA
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
FARZANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Kumar Pandey
For the Respondent: Arun Srivastava and Anupama Srivastava

JUDGMENT :

J.R. Midha, J.

1. The appellants have challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs. 3,62,500/- has been awarded to the appellants.

2. The accident dated 10th May, 2000 resulted in the death of Master Farman aged 7 years. The parents of the deceased filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal. The deceased was a student of IInd standard in P.D. Public School. The learned Tribunal took the notional income of the deceased to be Rs. 22,500/- and applied the multiplier of 15 to compute the loss of dependency to be Rs. 3,37,500/-. Rs. 10,000/- has been awarded towards medical expenses and Rs. 5,000/- each has been awarded towards transportation of the dead body, funeral expenses and loss of estate. The total compensation is awarded Rs. 3,62,500/-.

3. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Tribunal has not made 1/3rd deduction towards the personal expenses of the deceased while computing the compensation. The second ground submitted by learned Counsel for the appellant is that the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act provides for notional income of Rs. 15,000/- whereas the learned Tribunal has taken the notional i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top