SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.
JAMIRUL NISHA AND ANOTHER - Appellant
Vs.
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - Respondent
FAO No. 4 of 2007
Decided on : 05-03-2008

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pratima N. Chauhan
For the Respondent: S.R. Narayan

The central legal point established in the judgment is that for claiming compensation under the Railways Act, it is crucial to prove that the victim had accidentally fallen from the train, as defined in the Act.

Headnote:

Railways Act - Compensation Claim - 1989 - Section 124A

Fact of the Case:

The appellants filed a claim application under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation for the death of a passenger who allegedly fell from a train. The railways contested the claim, arguing that the injuries were self-inflicted and the deceased was not a bona fide passenger.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence presented by the appellants was insufficient to prove that the deceased had accidentally fallen from the train. The court also disbelieved the testimony of a witness presented by the appellants, concluding that the deceased was neither a bona fide passenger nor had died of injuries sustained from falling from the train.

Issues: The main issues were whether the deceased was a bona fide passenger and whether his death resulted from an untoward incident as defined in the Railways Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that for claiming compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, it is essential to establish that the victim had accidentally fallen from the train. Since the appellants failed to prove this, the question of the railways proving that the death was not the result of an untoward incident did not arise.

Final Decision: The court affirmed the order dismissing the claim application and dismissed the appeal.

JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. Present appeal lays a challenge to the order dated 20.11.2006 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi dismissing the claim application of the appellants.

2. Appellants had filed a claim application u/s 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 claiming compensation in sum of Rs. 6 lakhs on account of the death of Late Sh. Sarfaraj Khan (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) alleged to have been caused when he had accidentally fallen from a train.

3. In the claim application it was averred that on 10.05.2003 the deceased had boarded EMU passenger train GDM 1 from Nizamuddin station for a journey from Nizamuddin to New Delhi Railway Station. That since the train was overcrowded the deceased got a place near the door of a compartment of the train. That at around 8.45 AM when the train was approaching Tilak Bridge Railway Station there was a sudden jerk due to which the deceased fell down from the train and died of injuries received as a result thereof. That the deceased was a bona fide passenger and that the death of the deceased was a result of an 'untoward incident' which happened when he was traveling in EMU passenger train GDM 1. That the deceased was self-employed and earning his livelihood by working as a painter. That the appellants are the widowed mother and sister of the deceased and were dependent upon the earnings of the deceased.

4. The railways defended the claim by pleading that the appellants are not entitled to any compensation as injuries which resulted in the death of the deceased were not accidental but self-inflicted injuries. That the deceased was not a bona fide passenger in the train. That the accident in question occurred when while trying to cross the railway track the deceased came into contact with the moving train. (Meaning thereby was run over while crossing the railway track)

5. In support of the claim appellants examined appellant No. 1 Jamirul Nisha mother of the deceased as AW-1 and one Mr.Manik Mian as AW-2 who claimed to have witnessed the said untoward incident.

6. In her testimony appellant No. 1 deposed on the lines of the claim application. She further deposed that on the unfaithful day i.e. 10.05.03 the deceased left his residence situated at Sarai Kale Khan, Delhi at about 8.15 in the morning. That the deceased told her that he is going to New Delhi for taking payment from some contractor. She also deposed how her son died.

7. Sh. Manik Mian AW-2 stated that the deceased was traveling under a valid ticket and that the death of the deceased was a result of an untoward incident. He deposed that on 10.05.2003 at about 8.15 AM he met the deceased near the booking counter of the Nizamuddin Station. That he purchased two tickets for a journey from Nizamuddin Station to the New Delhi Railway Station and gave one ticket to the deceased. That thereafter they boarded the EMU passenger train GDM1. That since the train was overcrowded they both got a place near the door of the compartment. That when the train was approaching Tilak Bridge railway station there was a sudden jerk due to which the deceased fell down from the train. That after the deceased fell down from the train he cried and requested other passengers to pull the alarm chain but the train did not stop. That thereafter he got down at the Tilak Bridge station and while going out of the platform he informed one railway official regarding the said incident.

8. It is relevant to note that in cross-examination AW-2 gave reason why he and the deceased were co-passengers. He stated as under: 'Mandawali is near Mother Dairy, Patparganj, Delhi. I was accompanying the deceased as I was to take him to Mandawali along with me. He had met at the station itself. I had not taken any money from the deceased for purchasing the ticket nor I received it after I had given the ticket to him. I was taking him to Mandawali for white washing my house. I had pulled the chain after the deceased had fallen from the train, bu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top