JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. - By way of thisjudgement, weshall dispose of the above-noted appeals preferred against the common order dated 19.03.2018, whereby Appellant''s (VIPL) objection petitionsunder Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter ''the Act'')have been rejected, and common arbitral award dated 20.05.2017 stands confirmed.This impugned arbitralaward deals with two separate claim petitions preferred by the Appellant relating to respective Space Buyer Agreements(hereinafter ''arbitration agreements'')concerning separate portions of same property. Since the objection petitions have been disposed of vide a common judgment, wealso consider it convenient to dispose of theappeals vide a common judgement.

2. The facts of the present case have been elaborately noted by the Sole Arbitrator in the impugned award and also by the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment. Since there is not much dispute about the same, and furthermore as scope of the surviving controversy encapsulated hereinafter is narrow, we need not recount the entire facts and rather verbatim note from the impugned judgment only thosewhich are essential, for the disposal of the