SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Del) 1417

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Raheja Developers Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Pran Mehta & Ors. - Respondent
O.M.P.(I) (Comm.) 32 of 2020 and IA 1671 of 2020
Decided On : 18-02-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Ms. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Shreya Raychaudhuri, Advocates, for the Appellant; Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Samapika Biswal and Mr. Rishabh Sureka, Advocates, for the Respondents

The appointment of a Sole Arbitrator and the expeditious consideration of applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Headnote:

Arbitration - Appointment of Sole Arbitrator - Summary: The court appointed a former Chief Justice as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from various agreements between the parties.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner withdrew the suit against the respondents, and with the consent of the parties, a former Chief Justice was appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from multiple agreements.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition and directed the parties to move an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act within a specified period. The appointed Arbitrator was instructed to consider the application expeditiously and was granted the freedom to decide the application uninfluenced by the court's order.

Issues: Appointment of Sole Arbitrator, Application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the withdrawal of the suit, the consent of the parties, and the need for expeditious consideration of the application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and the parties were directed to move an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act within a specified period. The appointed Arbitrator was granted the freedom to decide the application uninfluenced by the court's order.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

1. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner/ plaintiff has handed over a copy of the order passed on 13.02.2020 by the Court of Ms. Sumitra Kadian, Civil Judge, Gurugram, whereby the petitioner has withdrawn the suit, being CS No.1501/2019 against respondents/defendant nos.1 to 7. Copy of the order is taken on record.

2. With the consent of the parties, Honble Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed, Former Chief Justice, Jammu & Kashmir High Court is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the following agreements :

    Agreement to Sell dated 10.04.2017;

    Agreement of Guarantee dated 26.04.2017;

    Collaboration Agreement dated 20.07.2012;

    Collaboration Agreement dated 16.09.2013,

    Supplementary Collaboration Agreement dated 21.10.2014;

    Supplementary Collaboration Agreement dated 27.05.2015;

    Agreement dated 31.03.2017;

    Addendum to Collaboration Agreement dated 27.04.2017 and

    Deed of Adherence dated 21.10.2014.

    3. The address and mobile number of the learned Arbitrator is as under:

      Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed,

      Former Chief Justice, Jammu & Kashmir High Court 14, Friends Colony (West), Block-A, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110065

      Mobile: 7042205786

      4. The learned Arbitrator shall give disclosure under Section 12 of the Act before entering upon reference.

      5. Fee of the Arbitrator shall be fixed as per Fourth Schedule of the Act.

      6. Ms. Manmeet Arora, on instructions, from the respondent nos.1 to 7 submits that till the Arbitrator takes up the application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), proposed to be filed by the petitioner herein, the respondents will not sell, transfer, convey or create any third party rights in any manner whatsoever in the properties being 4.05 Acres (commercial land) as stated in Addendum to Collaboration Agreement dated 27.04.2017.

      7. Needless to state, the petitioner will move an application under Section 17 of the Act within a period of two days from constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal. Learned Arbitrator is requested to consider the application under Section 17 of the Act expeditiously.

      8. Arbitrator is free to decide the application under Section 17 of the Act uninfluenced by the order passed by this Court and is at liberty to vary, modify or continue the order passed by this Court.

      9. The petition is disposed of along with the pending application in the aforesaid terms.

      10. Dasti.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top