SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Del) 1019

BRIJESH SETHI
Joint Director, Directorate Of Enforcement – Appellant
Versus
A. Raja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay Jain, Advocate, Sonia Mathur, Advocate, Naveen Matta, Advocate, Amit Mahajan, Advocate, Padmesh Mishra, Advocate, Arkaj Kumar, Advocate, Noor Rampal, Advocate, Mallika Hiremath, Advocate, Sudhir Kumar, Advocate, Manu Sharma, Advocate, Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate, Mudit Jain, Advocate, Ashul Aggarwal, Advocate, Shailesh Pandey, Advocate, Barkha Rastogi, Advocate, Hardik Sharma, Advocate, Mahesh Agarwal, Advocate, Rishi Agrawala, Advocate, Niyati Kohli, Advocate, Pratham Vir Agarwal, Advocate, Sandeep Kapur, Advocate, Vir Inder Pal Singh Sandhu, Advocate, Abhimanshu Dhyani, Advocate, Sahil Modi, Advocate, Balaji Subramanian, Advocate, Ishani Banerjee, Advocate, Sudershan Rajan, Advocate, Hitain Bajaj, Advocate, Rohit Kumar, Advocate, Tarannum Cheema, Advocate, Akshay Nagarajan, Advocate, Varun Sharma, Advocate, Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate, Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate, Inspector Manoj, Advocate, Vedanta Varma, Advocate, Pratham Veer Aggarwal, Advocate, D.P. Singh, Advocate, Sonam Gupta, Advocate, Ishita Jain, Advocate, Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate, Mohit Kumar Auluck, Advocate, Pramod Sharma, Advocate, Manali Singhal, Advocate, Santosh Sachin, Advocate, Deepak S Rawat, Advocate, Aanchal Kapoor, Advocate, Joseph Aristotle S, Advocate, Neha Nagpal, Advocate, Vishvendra Tomar, Advocate, Dayan Krishnan, Advocate, Arshdeep Singh, Advocate, Hitesh Rai, Advocate, Sanjay Abot, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Brijesh Sethi, J. - Vide these applications, petitioners Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Directorate of Enforcement (ED) are seeking early hearing of the criminal leave petitions. These petitions have been filed seeking ''leave to appeal'' against the judgment dated 21st December, 2017 passed by learned Special Judge acquitting all the respondents for the offences charged against them, which are as under:-

    I.

    In Crl.L.P.184/2018

    u/s 3 of PMLA and punishable under Section 4 of PMLA

    II.

    In Crl.L.P.185/2018

    sections 420/409/468/471/193 IPC r/w section 120 B IPC r/w sections 7/11/12/13 (2) r/w section 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

    III.

    Crl.L.P.257/2018

    Section 420 IPC r/w section 120B IPC

    2. It is averred in the applications that all the three petitions arise out of common FIR and have similar set of facts and, therefore, upon the directions of the Hon''ble Supreme Court, these petitions have always been heard together. It is submitted that facts in Crl.L.P. 185/2018 are connected to tha

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                whatsapp-icon Back to top