SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 26

VIBHU BAKHRU
Sandeep @ Bhopali – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Puneet Singhal, S.P. Bhati, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Ravi Nayak, APP.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition impugning a judgment dated 02.09.2020 (hereinafter ‘the impugned judgment’), whereby the petitioner’s appeal against a judgment dated 26.07.2019 convicting him for an offence punishable under Section 354/451 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter ‘IPC’) and an order dated 27.08.2019 sentencing him for the said offences, was dismissed.

2. The learned Trial Court found merit in the prosecution’s case that, at about 01:00 p.m. on 04.08.2014, the petitioner had entered into the house of the complainant. She was resting at that time. He had caught hold of her left hand and given a blow on her chest with the intention to outrage her modesty. In addition, he had allegedly threatened her.

3. The complainant was examined as PW2. She stated that she was working as a maid in the nearby houses. She testified that on 04.08.2014, at about 01:00 p.m. or 01:30 p.m., she returned back home after completing her work and was lying on her cot. She stated that the petitioner, who lived near her house, entered the house and started physically abusing her. She alleged that he delivered a blow on her chest and had also threatened that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top