Vinay vs State - 2021 Supreme(Del) 33

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Del) 33

VIBHU BAKHRU
Vinay – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Vijay Kinger, Zeeshan Hashmi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ravi Nayak, APP.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellants have impugned a judgment dated 21.07.2016, whereby the appellants were convicted of offences punishable under section 323, 354, 354A, 356, 394, 450, 452, 506 (Part II) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). In addition, the appellant Vinay was also convicted of an offence punishable under Section 411 of the IPC. The appellants also impugn an order on sentence dated 25.07.2016, whereby the appellants were sentenced in respect of the offences committed by them.

2. A tabular statement indicating the sentences awarded to the appellants in respect of the offences for which they were convicted is set out below: -

S. No.	Offence	Sentence
1.	S. 323 IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 year with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in the event of default in payment of fine, Simple Imprisonment for 30 days.
2.	S. 354 IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in the event of default in payment of fine, Simple Imprisonment for 30 days.
3.	S. 354-A IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 year with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Del) 33

VIBHU BAKHRUVinay – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

VIBHU BAKHRU
Vinay – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent