SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 39

VIBHU BAKHRU
Mohd. Musa – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Roshan Lal Saini, Kavita Saini, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Ravi Nayak, APP.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 03.07.2017, whereby the Ld. ASJ, Karkardooma Courts convicted the appellant for committing an offence punishable under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). By an order dated 12.07.2017, which is also impugned in this appeal, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months for committing an offence punishable under Section 411 of the IPC.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 07.04.2016, one Mohammed Izhar lodged an online FIR No 10505/16, under Section 379 of the IPC regarding theft of his motorcycle bearing no. DL-5S-AK-3375. Thereafter, on 14.04.2016, Special Staff, North East apprehended the appellant with the stolen vehicle. Further at the instance of the appellant, parts of the two-wheeler vehicle were recovered. The chassis bearing no. 11969 of the abovesaid motorcycle was also recovered from the premises of the appellant and was lodged as DD No. 70B. The accused was arrested in kalandar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top