JUDGMENT :

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.

1. The present petition U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-

“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 16.12.2020 passed in Revision Petition No. 97/2020, by the learned District and Sessions Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, and quash the complaint filed by the Respondent no. 2, being C.C. No. 7398/19, pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi against the petitioner.”

2. The facts of case are that in January 2009, accused No. 2 Guneet Bhasin accused No. 3 Sumit Bhasin (Petitioner herein) and accused No. 4 Smt. Summy Bhasin approached Respondent No. 2/Complainant and allured him into investing Rs. 50 lacs in their company with the assurance that same would be doubled in five years and relying on such assurances, he invested his lifetime savings with them and in March 2014 the accused persons failed to return the principal amount with interest being total of Rs. 1 Crore but then he was further inducted to invest Rs. 20 lacs more with the promise to return Rs. 2 crores on or before March