JUDGMENT :

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Petitioner is seeking bail in FIR No. 92/2020, registered at police station Dayalpur, Delhi for the offences under Sections 147/148/149/153A/505/436/307/120B/34 IPC and Sections 27/30 Arms Act on the ground that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody since 16.03.2020.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. D.K. Bhatia, learned Special Public Prosecutor for respondent/State accepts notice.

4. With the consent of both the sides, the present petition has been taken up for hearing and disposal.

5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that by the present petition, petitioner is primarily seeking bail on parity with accused Tanvir Malik, who has already been granted bail in this FIR case by this Court on 04.02.2021 and accused Shah Alam, who has been granted bail on 05.04.2021 by the Court of Sessions as well as accused Nazim, who has also been granted bail by the Court of Sessions on 28.11.2020.

6. He further submits that petitioner was not initially named in the FIR in question and prosecution has failed to establish its case, as neither the CCTV footage nor the call detail record of petitioner