SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Akshay Kanotra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Petitioner is in judicial custody since his arrest on 27.02.2018. He has been charged for the offences under Sections 307/328/364/379 IPC by the learned trial court in FIR No. 89/2018, registered at police station Vikas Puri, New Delhi and is facing trial for the same.
2. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail while claiming that he has been falsely implicated and no offence as alleged, is made out against him. Further ground taken is that main charge sheet as well as supplementary charge sheet in this case have been filed, which casts a doubt on the involvement of petitioner in the instant case.
3. The present case has been registered on the statement of injured/complainant -Rahul Malik. In his complaint, he has stated that he is working as Property Dealer and he knew petitioner/accused since his school days, who was working as Agent for purchase and sale of second hand cars. Transaction of money between the two was common and as such, he had lent Rs.7.00 Lacs to the petitioner. Further stated in the complaint that on 25.02. 2018 he received two three calls from the petitioner saying that petitioner had received amount of Rs.2.5 Lacs in his account and wanted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.