SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 216

SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ishika – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ajay Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Amit Chadha, APP.

JUDGMENT :

1. Present petition has been filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in pursuance to FIR No.261/2020 registered at Police Station Samaipur Badli for the offences punishable under sections 29/21/61/85 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2. Case of the petitioner is that bar of section 37 of NDPS Act is not applicable in the present case, therefore, this court may exercise its discretion and enlarged the petitioner on bail. The substance alleged to have been recovered from the petitioner is 112 gms. of heroin and 152 gms. from the co-accused Ravi Kiran. Accordingly, it is evident that the contraband recovered from the petitioner was intermediate and as per the notification of intermediate quantity, the bar under section 37 of NDPS Act will not be attracted in the present case as the same is applicable only in offences involving commercial quantity.

3. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that both the accused persons were apprehended separately and the contraband was also recovered separately, wherein there was no element of abetment or criminal conspiracy between the petitioner and the co-accused to commit the alleged offence. To

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top