IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
Nikhil Nanda & Another – Petitioner
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Another – Respondent
Test.Cas. No. 40 of 2019
Decided On : 24-02-2021
Indian Succession Act - Probate - 276 - The court granted probate of the Will dated January 04, 2018 in favor of the petitioner No.1, Nikhil Nanda, in respect of the Offshore Bank Account (GBP) with HSBC Bank, HSBC Expat Jersey, HSBC House, Explanade, ST Helier, Jersey JE11HS being Account No. 406162-11997114.
Fact of the Case:
The petition was filed seeking probate of the Will dated January 04, 2018 of the deceased Rajan Nanda. During the pendency of the petition, petitioner No.2, Ritu Nanda, expired, and an application was filed to bring on record her legal heirs. The court allowed the application and granted probate in favor of petitioner No.1.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had succeeded in proving the document to be a validly executed Will of Rajan Nanda dated January 04, 2018. The court also noted that it had territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the petition.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Will dated January 04, 2018 was validly executed and whether the court had jurisdiction to grant probate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner had succeeded in proving the document to be a validly executed Will and that the court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and probate was granted in favor of petitioner No.1, Nikhil Nanda, in respect of the Offshore Bank Account (GBP) with HSBC Bank, HSBC Expat Jersey, HSBC House, Explanade, ST Helier, Jersey JE11HS being Account No. 406162-11997114.
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 was initially filed by two petitioners (namely Nikhil Nanda and Ritu Nanda), with the following prayers:
“In view of the above stated facts and circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
a. Grant, in favour of the Petitioner being the named Executor, Probate of the Will dated 04-01-2018 duly executed by the Testator, Late Shri Rajan Nanda @ R P Nanda Son of Late Shri Har Prasad Nanda and
b. Pass such other or further order/s or such directions, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case and also to meet the ends of justice.”
2. In substance, Nikhil Nanda petitioner No.1 is seeking Probate of the document purported to be the Will dated January 04, 2018 of the deceased Rajan Nanda @ R.P. Nanda. It is stated in the petition that petitioner being the appointed executor / administrator to the Will has distributed amongst the beneficiaries the immovable property(s) mentioned in the Will and also the movable properties.
3. It is stated in the petition that the testator Rajan Nanda @ R.P. Nanda, who expired on August 05, 2018, in Gurugam, Haryana, has executed a registered Will dated January 04, 2018, duly attested by Vinod Dixit and Dr. S.R. Ahuja.
4. It is the case of the petitioner No.1 and Ritu Nanda that the said Will was duly registered with the office of Sub-Registrar-V (1), New Delhi as Document No.17 in Additional Book No.3, Vol. No. 42 at pages 72 to 83 on January 04, 2018.
5. In the present petition, notice was issued to the State on May 27, 2019 and citations had been published in the newspaper ‘The Statesman’ (English) Delhi edition and ‘Navbharat Times’ (Hindi) Delhi edition. Objections have not been filed despite publication of the citations. Notice was duly served on the State and Valuation report has been filed by the SDM, Badkhal regarding valuation of immovable property, i.e., 2, Friends Colony, and Asst. Collector (Grade-I) Sub Division (Defence Colony), District South-East, New Delhi has submitted report dated August 08, 2019 along with bank statement of Account in HSBC in the name of late R.P. Nanda.
6. Affidavits supporting the petition / ‘No Objections’ have been filed by the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 to the effect that they do not have any objection if the relief as prayed for, is granted in favour of Ritu Nanda / petitioners.
7. Petitioner No.1 also entered the witness box and tendered the evidence by way of affidavit (Ex.PW1/X) in examination-in-chief. Along with documents exhibited, he has proved the petition as Ex. PW1/1A and the Death Certificate of the deceased as Ex. PW1/1 (OSR). Though, he has also sought to prove the document exhibited as Ex. PW 1/2 (OSR) dated January 04, 2018 as the validly executed last Will of the deceased Rajan Nanda but not being an attesting witness thereto, his evidence in that respect is irrelevant. Further, the petitioner has proved the passport of the testator as Ex. PW-1/3 (OSR).
8. PW-2 Vinod Dixit, in his evidence by way of affidavit (Ex.PW2/X) has deposed, that (i) he is one of the attesting witnesses of the Will dated January 04, 2018 executed by the deceased testator; (ii) the Will was executed by the deceased in his presence; (iii) one Dr. S.R. Ahuja was also present when the Will dated January 04, 2018 was executed; (iv) he along with Dr. S.R. Ahuja signed the said Will in presence of each other as well as the Testator; (v) that the said Will was registered in the office of Sub Registrar V(l), New Delhi on January 04, 2018, where the Deponent / he along with the Testator as well as Dr. S. R. Ahuja, the other Attesting Witness, were also present.
9. Appearing before the Joint Registrar on November 14, 2019, PW-2 Vinod Dixit has tendered his evidence by way of affidavit (Ex.PW2/X) in examination-in-chief and identified his signature at Point A & B on Ex. PW2/X. He relied upon the document, which is Ex.PW1/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.