PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).
CM APPL. 2915/2021(for exemption)
2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Application is disposed of.
CM APPL. 2916/2021 (for dispensing service to Respondents No. 2 to 6)
4. Considering the nature of the disputes, this Court deems it appropriate to issue notice to Respondents Nos. 2 to 6. Let notice be served through the counsel appearing for the said Respondents before the trial court. Application is disposed of.
FAO 36/2021 and CM APPL. 2914/2021 (for stay), & CM APPL. 3573/2021 (for appointment of Receiver)
5. The dispute in the present case concerns the Kalkaji mandir wherein various factions claim rights for conducting the puja sewa, share in the offerings and revenues from other moveable/immoveable assets including teh- bazari rights.
6. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellants/ Defendants (hereinafter, “Defendants”) challenging the impugned order dated 16th January, 2021, passed by the Additional District Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, vide which Respondent No. 1/ Plaintiff (hereinafter, ‘Plaintiff’) has been given the bari for performing the puja sewa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.