JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

Petitioner impugns order dated 01.11.2014 whereby the appellate court has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner impugning order dated 06.06.2013 whereby the trial court had fixed the maintenance for the petitioner and her daughter at Rs. 10,000/- per month with effect 13.09.2011.

2. Parties were married on 11.07.2008. On 02.05.2009, a daughter was born who is in the care and custody of the petitioner.

3. As per the petitioner she was turned out of her house on 14.11.2010 on account of failure to bring enough dowry and to give a car.

4. The respondent has filed proceedings for divorce which are pending. The petitioner filed the subject petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005.

5. By the impugned order dated 06.06.2013, the trial court held that respondent had not clearly disclosed his income and the assertion that he was earning only Rs. 12,000/- per month was unbelievable and accordingly prima facie assessed his income at Rs. 30,000/- and awarded Rs. 10,000/- to the petitioner and her daughter.

6. The appellate court by the impugned order found no infirmity in the view taken by the trial court and dismissed the appeal filed by