SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Del) 1510

SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Sufi Hakim Hafiz Suleman – Appellant
Versus
Haseena Begum – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.D. Ansari, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mohd. Elahi, Saiful Islam and Dimpal, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 22.11.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from two rooms, kitchen and bathroom of property No. 478, Gali Pahar Wali, Quresh Nagar/Qasabpura, Sadar Bazar.

3. One of the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in the affidavit filed in support of the leave to defend application is that respondent is the owner and in possession of property No. 7461, Madara Wali Gali, Chhoti Masjid, Quresh Nagar, Sadar Bazar, Delhi, which has not been disclosed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said address is also mentioned in the alleged Ikrarnama (rent agreement) filed by the respondent (page 111) as the address of the respondent.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner had filed a Suit for injunction against the husband of the respondent and had also specifically stated that the husband of the respondent was resi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top