Back
JYOTI SINGH
Dharna Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Aryan Infratech Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for quashing complaint and summons. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court observes established precedent for handling ex-parte complaints. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. argument of resignation and non-liability post-resignation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. specific allegations needed for vicarious liability. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. judicial standards affirmed for complaint requirements under nia. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. legal observations on vicarious liability under nia. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 7. case specific findings on absence of adequate allegations. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 8. summoning orders quashed based on legal insufficiency. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. conclusion allowing the petition and dismissing complaint. (Para 32) |
JUDGMENT :
Jyoti Singh, J.
1. Present petition has been filed by the Petitioner for quashing the summoning order dated 28.11.2016 and the complaint bearing CC No. 6573/2017 filed by the Respondent against the Petitioner under Sections 138 /141/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as ' NIA ') as well as all further pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
