MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Altaf Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCTD of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)
1. The present appeal filed under Section 374(2) read with Section 383 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant has been preferred against the judgment dated 30.11.2019 and order on sentence dated 10.12.2019 passed by the learned ASJ-04, Special Judge: POCSO Act, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 43/2017 in respect of FIR No. 247/2016 registered under Sections 5(m)/6 of the POCSO Act at P.S. Begumpur whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Further, vide order on sentence dated 10.12.2019, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years along with payment of fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default whereof to further undergo SI for 30 days.
2. The brief facts, as noted by the trial court, are as follows:
Panchhi & Ors. v. State of U.P. reported as (1998) 7 SCC 177
State of U.P. v. Krishna Master & Ors. reported as (2010) 12 SCC 324
Vijay @ Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh reported as (2010) 8 SCC 191
Rajinder @ Raju v. State of Himachal Pradesh reported as (2009) 16 SCC 69
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramesh & Anr. reported as (2011) 4 SCC 786
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.