SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Apex Institute Of Ayurveda Sciences, Apex University - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 5486 of 2021 with CM APPL. 17006 of 2021
Decided On : 28-07-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Vikrant N Goyal, Advocate, Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Advocate with Mr. Kumar Prashant, Ms. Vanya Gupta, Mr. Parmod Kumar Vishnoi, Advocates

Point of Law : Permission to establish a new Ayurveda Medical College - Special powers of State Government in certain circumstances - Provisions of State Act were insufficient to satisfy requirements of Form-4.

Headnote:

Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Section 13A - University, Jaipur Act, 2018- Section 4, 41 to 44 - Medical College Regulations, 2019 - Regulation 7(1) - No-Objection Certificate - Whether requirements of Regulation 6(1)(c) read with Regulation 7(1) and Form-4 of the Regulations, have been satisfied by the petitioner - Petitioner’s application was rejected and returned by impugned communication of the UOI dated 10.10.2020. The ground of rejection was that the petitioner had not submitted a No-Objection Certificate [“NOC”] by the State Government in Form-4 of the Establishment of New Medical College, Opening of New or Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity by a Medical College Regulations, 2019.

Finding of the court : Form-4, in addition to indicating that State has no objection to establishment of the Ayurveda medical college, requires other points of information to be supplied by State, which would enable UOI and Central Council of Indian Medicine [“CCIM”] to reach an informed decision as upon application. In present case also, Act does not contain such provisions as to answer requirements of Form-4. It is evident from the form itself that UOI seeks information as to infrastructure available in State for medical education and requirement of proposed medical college in State. This information is neither available in provisions of Act nor in the communications referred to by Mr. Sharawat. Those two communications merely record position of the State that the University is not required to obtain an NOC for establishing college in question - Provision is also however not in terms of undertaking required by Form-4. Section 44(6) and 44(7) vest State Government with power to take action contemplated therein but do not cast an obligation upon it, as required by Form-4.

Result : Writ petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Prateek Jalan, J.

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The writ petitioner is a University constituted under an enactment of the State of Rajasthan entitled the Apex University, Jaipur Act, 2018 (Act No. 27 of 2018) [“the Act”]. It applied to the Union of India [“UOI”] on 27.08.2020 for permission to establish a new Ayurveda Medical College under Section 13A of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. The petitioner’s application was rejected and returned by the impugned communication of the UOI dated 10.10.2020. The ground of rejection was that the petitioner had not submitted a No-Objection Certificate [“NOC”] by the State Government in Form-4 of the Establishment of New Medical College, Opening of New or Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity by a Medical College Regulations, 2019 [“the Regulations”].

2. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that a university constituted under a State legislation such as the petitioner, does not require an NOC to establish a new medical college. He submits that Section 4 of the Act enumerates the objects of the university, which include research and studies in the discipline specified in Schedule-II of the Act, which in turn, includes Indian and Unani Medicine. Mr. Sharawat further submits that the Government of Rajasthan by its communications dated 03.07.2020 and 26.02.2021 has confirmed that the petitioner does not require an NOC for starting a course in Ayurveda.

3. The issue in the present case is whether the requirements of Regulation 6(1)(c) read with Regulation 7(1) and Form-4 of the Regulations, have been satisfied by the petitioner. The aforesaid provisions are in the following terms:-

    “6. Eligibility for making an application.-(1)For making an application under sub-regulation (1) of regulation 4, a person shall be eligible if,-

xxxx xxxx xxxx

(c) has obtained 'No Objection Certificate' in Form- 4 from the concerned State Government for establishing a new medical college at the proposed site;

xxxx xxxx xxxx

7. Recommendation of Central Council. - (1) The Central Government, after receipt of the applications shall scrutinized the application on the basic of eligibility criteria like Application Fee, No Objection Certificate of the State Government and Consent of Affiliation of the University etc. and the Central Government shall forward only eligible applications to the Central Council of Indian Medicine for further consideration and the ineligible and incomplete applications shall be rejected and returned to the applicants by the Central Government.”

Form-4 is reproduced in full hereinbelow:-

FORM-4

[See regulation 6]

No Objection Certificate from the State Government

No…………..

Government of ---------------------------

The Department of ISM/AYUSH,

To

Dated, the ____________

(Name and address of applicant),

Subject : No Objection Certificate

Reference :

Sir,

The desired “No Objection Certificate” in respect of following facts is being issued:-

(1) Number of Medical and Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa institutions already existing in the State.

(2) Number of seats available or number of Medical and Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa practitioners being produced annually.

(3) Number of Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa practitioners registered with the State Council/Board of Indian Systems of Medicine.

(4) Number of Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa practitioners in State Government Service.

(5) Number of vacant Government posts of Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa doctors in the State, particularly in rural/difficult areas.

(6) Number of Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa doctors registered with the State Employment Exchanges.

(7) Ayurved or Siddha or Unani Tibb or Sowa Rigpa Doctors-population ratio in the State.

(8) How the establishment of the medical College/increase in admission capacity/starting------------ ---- course wou

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top