AMIT BANSAL
Vaneeta Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Vikram Sehgal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the following three orders passed by the ADJ-02 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi passed in Civil Suit No.611999/2016:
(ii) Order dated 16th April, 2021 dismissing the application filed on behalf of the petitioners under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC for recalling respondent’s witnesses namely respondent himself, Jai Bhagwan, Charan Dass and Bijender Kumar for further cross-examination.
(iii) Order dated 16th April, 2021, only partly allowing the application of the petitioners under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of CPC for taking on record documents filed by the petitioners/defendants.
2. After hearing the parties, judgment was reserved in the matter on 17th September, 2021. Both parties have filed written submissions which have been taken on record.
3. The suit from which the pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.