SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 696

ASHA MENON
Rajiv Sarin – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Estates – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff : Mr. Sidhant Kumar and Ms. Manyaa Chandok.
For the Defendants : Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal.

ORDER :

I.As. 10163/2021 (of plaintiffs u/O VIII R-10 CPC to proceed ex-parte against the defendants), 13112/2021 (of defendants u/S 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement) & 13113/2021 (of defendants u/S 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in re-filing I.A.13112/2021)

1. By I.A. No.10163/2021, the plaintiffs No.1&3 have prayed that the defendants be proceeded ex-parte and their right to file the written statement be closed, in view of the fact that the defendants have not adhered to the strict time schedule prescribed for commercial suits. The defendants have, on the other hand filed I.A. Nos.13112/2021 & 13113/2021 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement and re-filing the condonation application respectively.

2. Before proceeding further, it may be noted that this suit has been filed by the children of late Sh. H.K. Sarin and Smt. Vera Sarin against the Directorate of Estates, Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India and the Competent Authority under Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (‘SAFEMA’ for short). The suit has been filed for recovery of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top