IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Ey Global Services Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 11957 & 12003 of 2016 & CM 27602 & 26831 of 2021
Decided On : 09-12-2021
Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 14 - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 9(1)(vi) - Service Agreement - Non-assignable sub-licence - Authority for Advance Rulings - Whether consideration received in respect of computer software (deliverables) by EYGSL (UK) is ‘royalty’ - challenge the Rulings/Orders both dated 10.08.2016 of the Authority for Advance Rulings - Application being AAR was filed by EY Global Services Ltd. (formally known as EYGBS Ltd). The Application(s) were filed by M/s EYME Technologies Private Limited and EYGBS (India) Private Limited, respectively. As recorded in Impugned Ruling, M/s EYME Technologies Private Limited has been amalgamated with EYGBS (India) Private Limited with effect from 01.04.2016 and therefore, at request of EYGBS (India) Private Limited, a common order was passed in the two references - Same has been challenged by EYGBS (India) Private Limited before us by way of W.P. (C). 12003 of 2016.
Finding of the court : Payment received by EYGSL (UK) from EYGBS (India) to be taxed as ‘royalty’, it is essential to show a transfer of copyright in the software to do any of the acts mentioned in Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 - Where the core of a transaction is to authorise the end-user to have access to and make use of the licenced software over which licencee has no exclusive rights, no copyright is parted with and therefore, the payment received cannot be termed as ‘royalty’ - Impugned Rulings dated 10.08.2016 passed by the learned AAR are set aside and it is held that the payment received by EYGSL (UK) for providing access to computer software to its member firms of EY Network located in India, that is, EYGBS (India), does not amount to ‘royalty’ liable to be taxed in India under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the India-UK DTAA.
Result : Petitions allowed
JUDGMENT :
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
1. These petition(s) challenge the Rulings/Orders both dated 10.08.2016 of the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AAR’) in the Application(s), being AAR No. 1043 of 2011; AAR No. 1408 of 2012; and AAR No. 1409 of 2012.
2. The Application, being AAR No. 1043 of 2011, was filed by EY Global Services Ltd. (formally known as EYGBS Ltd). The Application(s), being AAR No. 1408 of 2012 and 1409 of 2012, were filed by M/s EYME Technologies Private Limited and EYGBS (India) Private Limited, respectively. As recorded in the Impugned Ruling dated 10.08.2016, M/s EYME Technologies Private Limited has been amalgamated with EYGBS (India) Private Limited with effect from 01.04.2016 and therefore, at the request of EYGBS (India) Private Limited, a common order was passed in the two references. The same has been challenged by EYGBS (India) Private Limited before us by way of W.P. (C) 12003 of 2016.
3. In the Application(s), being AAR No. 1408 of 2012 and AAR No. 1409 of 2012, the learned AAR has followed its Ruling in AAR No. 1403 of 2011 and therefore, reference in the present judgment will be made to the facts from the writ petition, being W.P.(C) 11957 of 2016, which arises out of the said Impugned Ruling.
4. The learned AAR in its Impugned Ruling dated 10.08.2016 records that the EY Global Services Ltd. (EYGSL) UK [hereinafter referred to as the ‘EYGSL (UK)’] is a limited liability company engaged in providing technology and other support services and software licences to member firms of the EY network in various countries all over the world. All member firms, including EYGSL (UK), use the brand Ernst & Young (EY). The Petitioner – EYGSL (UK) has entered into contracts with various third-party vendors for the procurement of various software. It has also entered into a contract with EY member firms to provide support services and/or deliverables.
5. The EYGBS (India) Private Limited [hereinafter referred to as the ‘EYGBS (India)’] is an Indian company engaged in providing back-office support and data processing services. It has entered into an agreement with the EYGSL (UK) whereby it receives ‘Right to benefit from the Deliverables and/or Services’ from EYGSL (UK). The Impugned Ruling notes the specific services mentioned in the Services Schedule annexed to the Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter referred to as the ‘MOU’), which are rendered by EYGSL (UK) under the Service Agreement and the MOU executed between itself and the EYGBS (India). The same is quoted herein below:
1. Common standards and policies
1.1 Assisting in the development of Common Standards and Policies, including accounting policies, practices, principles and procedures.
1.2 When considered appropriate by EYG Services, providing practice manuals and other reference materials and otherwise assisting in the adoption and consistent application of Common Standards and Policies.
2. IT Services
2.1 Promoting the adoption, maintenance and development of high quality, common information technology and communication systems by Member Firms and providing advice and assistance in connection with the systems of Member Firms including where considered appropriate, developing or assisting in the development of such systems or any part of them.
2.2 Procuring for the Member Firms external software licences for their internal business use.
2.3 Coordinating and promoting a globally consistence policy with regard to technology infrastructure with the objective of delivering economies of scale for the Member Firms and avoiding duplicative systems or structures across the network.
3. Knowledge
3.1 Promoting and establishing global websites (both internet and intranet), establishing projects to c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.