IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
In the matter of : Moveen - Petitioner
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Appln. No. 2588 of 2021
Decided On : 13-12-2021
Information & Technology Act, 2000 - Section 66D - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 91 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 467, 468, 471, 201, 34 - Offence of Cheating - Grant of interim bail - Forgery of valuable security, will, etc - Complainant uploaded certain articles up for sale on OLX website - In response to her offer of sale, she got a call from mobile by one Raghuvendra Singh, who offered Rs.21,000/- for said items, to which complainant agreed and transaction was to be done through online payment mode. A dummy transaction of Rs.21/- was done by Raghuvendra to verify correctness of transaction - complainant transferred a total of Rs.34,000/-. After which, complainant was not able to contact the said Raghavendra Singh after calling multiple times and suspected that she had been defrauded by said person.
Finding of the Court: Petitioners have been in judicial custody for 10 months. This Court is aware that this kind of online cheating and fraud has become rampant in most parts of the country. Gravity or seriousness of the allegations alone cannot be a ground to deny bail to the accused if the facts and circumstances of case entitles the accused to be released on bail. The investigation has been completed and the chargesheet has been filed before learned Trial Court. The evidence are primarily documentary in nature. The petitioner is in no position to tamper with evidence which is in custody of the Police and takings into account his social status, chances of the petitioner to threaten the witnesses are remote. This Court, therefore, is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by further keeping the petitioners in custody. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant interim bail to the petitioner for a period of 30 days on the following conditions.
Result: Petition is disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Subramonium Prasad, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present application for grant of interim bail for period of 30 days in FIR No. 39/2021 dated 07.02.2021 registered at Police Station Civil Lines for offences under Section 420 IPC.
2. The facts in brief leading to the instant petitions are as follows:-
ii. It is stated that Raghavendra Singh resisted to do a complete transaction through internet banking and insisted to make transactions in tranches on Paytm, Google Pay, HDFC and SBI. It is stated that the complainant transferred a total of Rs.34,000/-. After which, the complainant was not able to contact the said Raghavendra Singh after calling multiple times and suspected that she had been defrauded by the said person.
iii. Based on this information, FIR No.39/2021 dated 07.02.2021 registered at Police Station Civil Lines for offences under Section 420 IPC. SI Kishan Chand and SI Rohit, in charge of Cyber Crime Cell, North District, Maurice Nagar were assigned the case and made efforts to understand the modus operandi and to nab the accused persons.
3. After preliminary enquiries, one Kapil Kumar Rajoria, a student of 12th Standard stated that he made friends with petitioner Manvendra Singh, who allegedly lured him with a sum Rs.1,000/- if he owned a bank account and operated a phone number under a fictitious name and address. It is stated that Kapil Kumar Rajoria opened a bank account accordingly and the ATM card cheque book was with Manvendra Singh.
ii. Based on revelations, Sajid (petitioner in BAIL APPLN. 3877/2021) was interrogated, he stated that he is a taxi driver and had made friends with Waris (petitioner in BAIL APPLN. 2753/2021), who allegedly enticed him to open a fake bank account with a sum Rs.2,000/- if he owned a bank account and operated a phone number under a fictitious name and address. Accordingly, Sajid opened numerous bank accounts with HDFC bank, ICICI bank, IDBI bank, IPO Bank, Fincare Small Finance Bank. Sajid further allegedly disclosed that before depositing money in the abovementioned accounts, Waris would call him and inform him. On checking the statements of these bank accounts, it was noticed that on 07.02.2021 a payment of Rs.20,000/- was deposited by Waris into Sajid’s Indian Post Payments Bank account. Petitioner/Sajid was arrested on 11.02.2021.
iii. Further joint enquiries by the Cyber Cell and the Police, got them in contact with the Manvendra Singh (petitioner in BAIL APPLN. 2831/2021), who stated that he was preparing for a government job and had made friends with Waris who allegedly lured him to commit online frauds and told him that online bank accounts with fictitious addresses had already been opened and the stage was set to dupe people without any detection. Waris allegedly told him that he would be paid Rs.5,000/- per transaction for each account. Petitioner/Manvendra Singh was arrested on 11.02.2021.
iv. After this, on 13.02.2021, the three accused persons, namely, Kapil Kumar Rajoria, Sajid, and Manvendra Singh were produced before the learned Magistrate, who remanded them to 14 days’ judicial custody.
v. During the custodial interrogation of the accused/Waris, he allegedly disclosed that he was working as a private school teacher and during this time he was introduced to the petitioner/Moveen, R/o Village-Bheelamka, Tehsil-Deeg, Bharatpur, Rajasthan; who lured
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.