PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
1. This hearing has been done in physical Court. Hybrid mode is permitted in cases where permission is being sought from the Court.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part heard matters.
3. Vide last order dated 15th November 2021, various directions were issued to the Delhi Police, SDMC, the ld. Administrator appointed by this Court, DUSIB, Delhi Jal Board as well as some of the baridaars.
Misconduct on the part of baridaars
4. As captured in paragraph 19 and 20 of the last order dated 15th November 2021, Mr. Nakul Bhardwaj and Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj are two individuals, who according to the interim report of the ld. Administrator dated 26th October 2020, have impeded, and obstructed the implementation of the directions passed by this Court. Accordingly, notice was issued to these two persons, and they were directed to be personally present in Court.
5. Today, Mr. Nakul Bhardwaj and Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj are present in Court. Mr. Rakesh Tikkoo, ld. Senior Counsel, appearing on beha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.