SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 830

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Rekha Palli, JJ.
Upasana Singh - Appellants
Vs.
Union of India and Ors. - Respondent
W.P. (C) 3450/2020 and CM Appl. 12231/2020
Decided On : 22-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Tanmaya Mehta and Rupal Luthra, Advs.
For the Respondents: Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC, Kinjal Shrivastava, Varun Kishore, Vinayak Mohanda, Namisha Jain, Aakansha Kaul, Manek Singh and G.D. Chawla, Advs.

Informed and reasoned exercise of administrative authority is essential for sustaining nominations to statutory bodies.

Headnote:

NOMINATION - Dental Council of India - Dentists Act, 1948, Section 3(f) - The court discussed the nomination of a member to the Dental Council of India under Section 3(f) of the Dentists Act, 1948 and the relevant file noting by the Hon'ble Health Minister. The court found that the nomination was vitiated due to non-application of mind and lack of awareness of the nominee's removal from service for misconduct by the Dental Council of India. The court emphasized the need for informed and reasoned exercise of administrative authority, and quashed the nomination.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the nomination of respondent no. 3 as a Member of the General Body of the Dental Council of India under Section 3(f) of the Dentists Act, 1948, citing the respondent's previous removal from service for misconduct.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the nomination of respondent no. 3 was vitiated due to non-application of mind by the Hon'ble Health Minister and lack of awareness of the respondent's removal from service for misconduct. The court emphasized the need for informed and reasoned exercise of administrative authority.

Issues: Challenge to the nomination of respondent no. 3 to the Dental Council of India under Section 3(f) of the Dentists Act, 1948.

Ratio Decidendi: The power of the Hon'ble Minister to nominate members to the Dental Council of India must be informed and imbued with reasons. Non-disclosure of relevant facts and lack of proper justification for the nomination render it unsustainable.

Final Decision: The nomination of respondent no. 3 to the Dental Council of India is quashed, and the petition is allowed with parties bearing their respective costs.

JUDGMENT :

Vipin Sanghi, J.

1. The background in which this petition has been preferred was noticed by us in our initial order dated 10.06.2020. We may extract the relevant portion thereof which reads as under:-

    "The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that respondent no. 3 has been nominated by respondent no. 1 as a Member of the General Body of respondent no. 2/Dental Council of India under Section 3(f) of the Dentists Act, 1948. The said nomination is challenged on the ground that respondent no. 3 was earlier serving respondent no. 2 in the capacity of Joint Secretary. He was charged of very serious misconduct and was found guilty of the said charges by the Council after conduct of a major penalty proceeding under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and, consequently, he was removed from service by respondent no. 2. The said removal has been challenged by respondent no. 3 before the Central Administrative Tribunal and its challenge is pending. No interim stay of the order of removal has been granted by the Tribunal. Despite that being the position, respondent no. 1 evidently oblivious of the said past history of respondent no. 3 has nominated him to General Body of the respondent no. 2 Council."

2. By the same order, we had restrained the respondent no. 3 from functioning as a member of the General Body of the respondent no. 2/Council. Simultaneously we had also restrained the respondent no. 2 from allowing the respondent no. 3 from functioning in that capacity.

3. We may notice that respondent no. 2 i.e. the Dental Council of India has supported the present petition and the opposition has come only from the Union of India and the respondent no. 3 himself.

4. Considering the fact that the Central Government had nominated the respondent no. 3-who had been removed from service upon finding that he had misconducted himself while functioning as the Joint Secretary of the same Council, this Court had required the respondents to produce the relevant file containing the said nomination. The said record has been produced before us and having perused the same, we find that the Hon'ble Health Minister vide his undated note while continuing the nomination of Dr. Rajeev K Chugh for another term w.e.f. 11.06.2020, nominated two persons including respondent no. 3 as members of the Council against two anticipated vacancies. The relevant extract from the said file noting reads as follows:-

    "O/o. Minister of Health & Family Welfare

I have perused the file relating to nomination of 03 Members for a period of 05 years to the Dental Council of India as per Section 3 of the Dentist Act, 1948 against the vacancies arising with effect from June 10, 2020 due to completion of term of existing Members.

2. I am of the view that Dr. Rajiv K Chugh be allowed to continue another term as nominated Member of the Dental Council of India with effect from June 11, 2020. Further, the following person be nominated as Members of the Council against the remaining 02 anticipated vacancies.

(1) Col. Dr. Saroj Kumar Ojha (Retired)

(2) Dr. Ashok Khandelwal.

3. The curriculum vitae of Col. Ojha and Dr. Khandelwal are placed on the file."

-signed-

(Dr. Harsh Vardhan)

HFM"

5. The aforesaid noting shows that the curriculum vitae of respondent no. 3 as also of Dr. Ashok Khandelwal was placed before the Hon'ble Minister. A bare perusal of respondent no. 3's curriculum vitae dated 19.12.2020 found on record shows that he had not disclosed the fact that while functioning as the Joint Secretary of respondent no. 2, he had been removed from service by respondent no. 2 after a full-fledged major penalty charge-sheet and inquiry, in which he was found guilty of misconduct.

6. The curriculum vitae of respondent no. 3, which has been placed on record in the file produced before us reads as follows:-

    "CURRICULUM VITAE FOR DCI MEMBER BY GOI UNDER SECTION 3(f) of DENTIST ACT 1948

COLONEL Dr. S.K. Ojha (Retd.)

1. Born on 7 June 1960

2. Graduate from Dr. R Ahmed Dental College & Hospital Ko

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top